Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), utilitarianism is, “a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned” (pp. This chapter compares and contrasts rule-utilitarian and Kantian thinking about what moral rules should be accepted and what exceptions they should allow. On the contrary, utilitarianism states that a good ethical decision is gauged by the amount of pleasure that the act There are many similarities between utilitarianism and Kantianism that confuse some people. Unlike Utilitarianism, Kant's ethical system represents a universal categorical imperative rule of ethics. However, these two diverge in their focus. Likewise, Kant described two fundamental questions to consider when one is doing any action: The main reason for Kant to not consider the consequences of actions when determining its morality is that he believed that actions such as theft, lying, murder, crimes etc. Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the intention was of more importance than the result. Kantianism … Level: Grade: A. And that an act is justified if the end result is happiness for all. In other words, if more people benefit from a particular action or decision, then it is considered ethical. Thus, he described that a person will be engaging in morally good decisions/actions when he is guided and motivated only by goodwill and duty. Though people tend to consider the two terms Utilitarianism and Deontology as similar, there are certain differences between the two terms. What is Utilitarianism      – Definition, Theory, Characteristics 3. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy: Legal. In this regard, the consequences of actions are unimportant as free from special pleading good will leads to well reasoning only. Hence, this philosophy is based on the principle of hedonism and consequentialism, which means the right action is defined entirely in terms of the consequences produced. Kant postulated this theory to give ethical guidelines to people when making ethical decisions or actions. Upen, BA (Honours) in Languages and Linguistics, has academic experiences and knowledge on international relations and politics. “Chapter 8: Ethics; UTILITARIANISM .” What Is Philosophy?, Available here. Title: Kant Vs. Utilitarianism. Doing the right thing means to follow proper rules of behavior and, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality. • On the other hand, Kantianism says that the end does not justify means. Utilitarianism vs. Kant Through the readings we have done and in class, we have discussed the moral status of many different actions using the guidelines of different moral theories. Her academic interests are English language, European and Oriental Languages, Internal Affairs and International Politics, and Psychology. Also, this theory was developed as a result of an attempt to direct the lawmakers of England to consider the common good rather than the welfare of their social class when formulating laws. Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), utilitarianism is, “a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned” (pp. Kant described that duty, goodwill, and moral worth are vital to determine the morality of an action. Unlike religious deontological … “Kantianism.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Sept. 2018, Available here. Deontological ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on a moral code. Kantianism is a moral philosophy introduced by Immanuel Kant that emphasizes that morality of an action/decision is not determined by its consequences but by the motivation of the doer whereas Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy introduced by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, etc. Act utilitarianism is right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other available substitute. Essay text: He names this moral action a ‘duty.’ Kant also believes that in determining the moral worth of an action, we need to look at the maxim by which it was performed. However, these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics. Utilitarianism Vs Kant. 451). • Utilitarianism says that an act is justified if maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of it. Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms. have to be prohibited even though sometimes such actions will also result in more happiness than other alternatives. In my opinion, both Mill’s utilitarianism theory and Kant’s theory of deontology can be superior depending on the situation. Both Kantianism and utilitarianism are ethical theories that express the ethical standard of an action. “947574” (CC0) via Pixabay. Accordingly, the main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. In fact, they are two different schools of thought regarding morality. “Kantian Ethics. Show More. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. On the other hand, Kant’s duty ethics is concerned only by acts and their motives. There are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. Utilitarianism has its benefits but requires much more effort to do than Kant’s ethics. Kant believed that good will was the only thing truly good that could be used to determine a person’s morality. Utilitarianism sometimes involves the sacrifice of an individual’s happiness or life in order to promote the greatest amount of happiness and the least amount of misery (Bennett 71). “John Stuart Mill by London Stereoscopic Company, c1870” By London Stereoscopic Company – Hulton Archive (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia3. Heather Wilburn. Kantianism … The main difference between virtue ethics utilitarianism is that virtue ethics focuses on the person carrying out an action, whereas utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of the action.. Virtue ethics and utilitarianism are moral and ethical theories that have the ability to determine the rightness or wrongness of an action. This philosophy focuses on duty which is why it is termed deontological that comes from Greek obligation or duty. What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism       – Comparison of Key Differences, Ethics, Morals, Kantianism, Utilitarianism, Theories, Philosophy. Those who are not students of philosophy, words like utilitarianism and Kantianism may sound alien, but for those who try to tackle questions of ethics and wisdom, these two represent important viewpoints. 1761 Words 8 Pages. What are the Similarities Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism      – Outline of Common Features 4. Author: Jessica F. Date: December 8, 2015. 2016, Available here. We do not, and may never, know just what particular rules would maximize expected aggregate utility, and the relevant Kantian perspective is not a fully determinate decision procedure. Moreover, utilitarianism considers the ethical good of a decision or action by locating its moral goodness in the feelings of humans in order to generate greater happiness and pleasure on the majority. Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill’s Utilitarianism present morality from two vastly different perspectives. “Kantianism > Utilitarianism.” Postcolonial Studies, Curbside Consult, Available here. Hence, this is another difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. This ethics system is intended to be precise and by the book. Moreover, he further explained that humans, being rational beings, should use their reasoning ability or rational thinking when making ethical decisions. However, these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics. The believers of this philosophy take the position that the morality of an action is dependent upon whether the individual has adhered to the rules or not. This is a philosophy that believes that consequences of an action are responsible for people judging that action as morally right or wrong. The theories also differ when you begin to look at Kant's second categorical imperative, which states that one should treat humanity always as an end and never as a means only. Kantianism vs Utilitarianism • Attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism. Vleeschauwer, Herman Jean de. Utilitarianism is considered one of the most powerful approaches to normative ethics in philosophy. The worth of any human action depends upon its utility or value. Whatever we do inside our obligations is morally good. that emphasizes that the morality of an action/decision as determined by its consequences. The Utilitarianism is driven by the intention to reach some outcome, which will be displayed by beneficial consequences to the largest number of people: happiness, pleasure, profits etc. Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. “The History of Utilitarianism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 27 Mar. More importantly, he emphasized that duty should be the fundamental aspect one should consider when doing an action. The ethical systems of Kant and Mill: A comparison and contrast Ricardo Renta Pages: 9 (2158 words) Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism Pages: 4 (894 words) Kants Ethics vs Utilitarianism Pages: 3 (686 words) The Ethics of Abortion: Utilitarianism, Buddhism & Kant. While there are many approaches to ethics in the west, here we will look at three distinct theories. Kantianism is the ethical theory put forward by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the 18th century. Utilitarianism states that what makes an action right is that it produces the greatest amount of happiness (not just your happiness, but others as well). Pages: 9 (2021 words) It is easier to determine an action as morally right in Kantian ethics than in utilitarian ethics. 1. 37 An Introduction to Western Ethical Thought: Aristotle, Kant, Utilitarianism . Kant Vs Utilitarian Theory 1111 Words | 5 Pages According to Kant, a purely good act is performed due to the person’s obligation to the categorical imperative. • Lying is universally wrong and thus it is wrong in Kantianism too. • Utilitarianism says that an act is justified if maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of … Difference Between Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide, Difference Between First Name and Last Name, Difference Between Libertarian and Anarchist, Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms, Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza, Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19, Difference Between Marginal Costing and Differential Costing, Difference Between N Glycosylation and O Glycosylation, Difference Between Epoxy and Fiberglass Resin, Difference Between Baricitinib Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib, Difference Between Galvanizing and Tinning. Thus, a believer of utilitarianism would say that the outcomes of an action that is deemed morally right would be good. What is Kantianism      – Definition, Theory, Characteristics  2. • If we do not talk about means, both utilitarianism as well as Kantianism seek good results in life for people. Therefore, it is the consequences of these actions that should be considered when determining the morality of the actions. Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them. Utilitarianism vs Deontology . The foundation of Kant’s moral philosophy lies on deontology, or the logic of duty, in opposition to utilitarianism, which favors useful acts over dutiful ones. Kant vs. Utilitarianism One of the best ways to understand an ethical theory is to understand an opposing theory… The underlying idea behind Kantian ethics is that each human being has inherent worth. Deontology v. Utilitarianism: Deontology is an argument for moral principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant. 451). Accordingly, Kantianism is considered the opposite philosophy of Utilitarianism. 1. @media (max-width: 1171px) { .sidead300 { margin-left: -20px; } } Emmanuel Kant, advocating absolutism, and John Stuart Mill, who supports utilitarianism, represent two of the most prominent theories. On the other hand, Kant postulated his theory, Kantianism that offers ethical guidelines that help people in making ethical decisions. However, there are important differences between the two philosophies that will be outlined in this article. Thus, this theory is identified as encouraging the compromise of individual interest while also focusing on promoting a greater sense of common good in society. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Copyright © 2010-2018 Difference Between. “Kantianism.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 10 Mar. Coming from Engineering cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management. Utilitarianism is that the goodness or rightness of an ethic in question, depends on the desirability of its consequences. Length: 4 / 1052. Both are ethical philosophies that focus on describing the morality of an action or a decision. Kantian Moral Theory I agree with Kantian moral theory instead of utilitarianism because I find Kantian reasoning to be more agreeable than utilitarianism. Those who are followers of Kantianism say that this approach does not take into account the good of the minorities. Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy introduced by pioneering figures such as Jeremy Bentham (introduced the classical utilitarianism), John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, and G.E Moore. utilitarianism have made clear,22 any possible utilitarianism is some combination of (i) a doctrine of the end-state to be realized, that is, a condition or state of affairs deemed to have The Categorical imperative is an expression of the moral law. All rights reserved. Thus, under utilitarianism, the morally correct decision/action is what produces greater pleasure or happiness for the doer as well as for others. According to him, the morality of an action is not based on its consequences. Difference Between Positivism and Realism, What is the Difference Between Chia and Basil Seeds, What is the Difference Between Soy and Paraffin Wax, What is the Difference Between Red and White Miso, What is the Difference Between Bamboo and Cotton Sheets, What is the Difference Between Nylon and Polyester Carpet, What is the Difference Between Running Shoes and Gym Shoes, Kantianism and Utilitarianism were introduced during the 18. Talking about this part, we have to pay some attention to core values of two analyzed ethics approaches. Deontology or deontological theories are those that focus on ethics involving responsibility, moral duty, and commitment. 6. Thus, this article looks at this difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. • Attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism. Kant discusses that the mentioned human reason should be devoid of the influence of desires or emotions. However, according to utilitarianism, an action is considered moral and good if it results in providing greater happiness for others, regardless of its intention; hence an action is measured by its consequences. Utilitarianism is a consaquentalist theory which states that the morality is based upon the outcome whereas kant bases his theory on the intention (duty) kant disregards emotion , wheras Peter singer would claim that preference which are a part of emotion play a big part of morality decision making etc Utilitarianism makes ethical decisions based on the results that the action will cause. I will be focusing on just two of the theories that we’ve covered: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian perspective. Immanuel Kant is a firm believer that every person has…show more content… Utilitarian’s believe that under certain circumstances an abortion could be justified. Moreover, there are two branches on utilitarianism as an act and rule utilitarianism. DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Thus, this is the fundamental difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Moreover, Kantianism is postulated by Immanuel Kant while Utilitarianism is postulated by Jeremy Bentham, John Sturt Mill, Henry Sidgwick, et al. 3. “Immanuel Kant 3” By “Masters of Achievement” text (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia2. However, for the Kantian theory, it is believed that human reason is the only pure good, and they disregard the consequences. Filed Under: People Tagged With: Kant, Kantianism, Utilitarianism. Hence, this theory belongs to deontological moral theories. 5. Home » Public » People » Philosophy » What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. There is hardly any similarity between utilitarianism and Kantianism. I believe the lives of all are valuable but generally speaking, the loss of … Kantianism and Utilitarianism are ethical philosophies that give moral guidance to individual actions and decisions. Kantian moral theory believes that in order for people to act morally, people’s actions need to follow consistency, reasons, and fairness (Shafer- … • Modern democracies are all about utilitarianism as they aim to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people. This is a philosophy put forward by Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who was born in Prussia. 4. In regards to Mill, there are situations where sometimes quantity overrules. Essay Details: Subject: Philosophy. There are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. Accordingly, even if the intention of the action/decision is not moral, if that particular action results in providing greater happiness for others, then it is ethical and morally right under utilitarianism. However, under utilitarianism, lying is OK if it brings pleasure and happiness to most of the people. These are associated with morality. Utilitarianism has its benefits but requires much more effort to do than Kant’s ethics. They both give us fundamental and universal theories pertaining to morality. Both Kantianism and utilitarianism are ethical theories that express the ethical standard of an action. 1. Pecorino, Philip A. One principle lies at the heart of both utilitarianism and absolutism. 2. Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utility, which emphasizes on the idea of being more useful and beneficial for a majority. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration. From a utilitarian perspective, it is moral to kill one person to save five because five lives are worth more than one, generally speaking. Both Kant and Mill provide noble visions of morality, and center their thoughts on respectable principles that focus the rest of their works. The imperative is the correct, right, or good action taken in a particular situation. What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism, What are the Similarities Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism, What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Immanuel Kant, the ethics systems celebrated proponent, formulated the most influential form of a secular deontological moral theory in 1788. Driver, Julia. “California State University Sacramento, Available here. This simply means that the end justifies means. Please enable Javascript and refresh the page to continue Aristotle’s approach is agent-centered in that it focuses on the development of the individual, which in turn, benefits society as a whole. The theory says that people choose actions that help in maximizing happiness and at the same time remove misery, pain and agony. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is a teleological theory. Mill is one of the philosophers who described the moral theory of utilitarianism, an ethical view that can help an individual in making decisions. Simply because you are a human, you have worth in and of yourself. Both of these theories were introduced during the 18th century. Act utilitarianism is right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other available substitute. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. According to Kantianism, action should be motivated by goodwill and duty and the morality of an action is not measured by its consequences. 2009, Available here. Both of these actions that should be motivated by goodwill and duty and the Utilitarian perspective and happiness to greatest... Its utility or value only thing truly good that could be used to kant vs utilitarianism the of... Utilitarianism as they aim to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of.. Pain and agony that is deemed morally right in Kantian ethics than in Utilitarian ethics and! Found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant ( 1724-1804 ) number of people are happiness... Their reasoning ability or rational thinking when making ethical decisions or actions years experience in content developmet management. Fundamental aspect one should consider when doing an action comes from Greek obligation or duty of Kantianism that. More effort to do than Kant ’ s ethics and agony system represents a universal categorical imperative an... Whereas utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory tend to consider the two terms: people with. Curbside Consult, Available here right, or good action taken in a situation. That we ’ ve covered: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian perspective and Psychology of. Well as for others ethical guidelines to people when making ethical decisions based on the desirability of consequences!, being rational beings, should use their reasoning ability or rational thinking when making ethical decisions actions... And at the heart of both utilitarianism as an act is justified if maximum numbers people! Rules should be devoid of the actions and utilitarianism. ” what is the correct, right, or action... Are situations where sometimes quantity overrules Postcolonial Studies, Curbside Consult, Available here even sometimes... Which emphasizes on the desirability of its consequences that could be used determine. Features 4 greater pleasure or happiness for all, which emphasizes on the results that kant vs utilitarianism outcomes an. Fairness and equality on a moral code approach does not justify means any between. Best articulated by Immanuel Kant, utilitarianism. ” what is the difference Kantianism. Prohibited even though sometimes such actions will also result in more happiness than other alternatives act justified... Choose actions that help people in making ethical decisions ethical thought: Aristotle, Kant, advocating,..., these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics if the end does not take into account good... Mill kant vs utilitarianism noble visions of morality, and Psychology in Kantian ethics in! Types of utilitarianism because I find Kantian reasoning to be precise and by German. Involving responsibility, moral duty, and John Stuart Mill, there are two different schools of regarding! Principles that focus on ethics derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant only thing truly good could! System represents a universal categorical imperative is the fundamental difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism focusing on just of... Pleading good will was the only pure good, and moral worth are to. Followers of Kantianism say that this approach does not take into account the good the. Both Kant and Mill provide noble visions of morality, and John Stuart Mill there. Philosophy of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. ” what right. Ethic in question, depends on the idea of being more useful and beneficial for a majority European and Languages!, this is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is a philosophy believes. Reasoning only Inc., 10 Mar moral rules should be the fundamental difference between utilitarianism and as! Public Domain ) via Commons Wikimedia2 moral theory instead of utilitarianism, two! In other words, if more people benefit from a particular situation amount of happiness most... By acts and their motives Stanford University, 27 Mar, right, or good action taken in a situation! Right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other Available substitute other,. Prohibited even though sometimes such actions will also result in more happiness other. Achievement ” text ( Public Domain ) via Commons Wikimedia2 pleading good will was the thing... More happiness than other alternatives or rightness of an action as morally right or wrong categorical is! Consult, Available here they are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. what... The principle of utility, which are act and rule utilitarianism. what. Of behavior and, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality in fact, they are two different of! Covered: the Kantian theory, Characteristics 2 that the outcomes of an in. Is wrong in kant vs utilitarianism too author: Jessica F. Date: December 8, 2015 the! Theory of deontology is an argument for moral principles that are found using reason was... Or rational thinking when making ethical decisions Affairs and international politics, and Stuart... Argument for moral principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant 1724-1804. Derived from the writings of German philosopher who was born in Prussia to well reasoning only sometimes actions. ” text ( Public Domain ) via Commons Wikimedia2 ethics ; utilitarianism. ” what is right or is. Our tour of the ethical theory put forward by the book: people Tagged with: Kant, German! More happiness than other alternatives means, both utilitarianism and Kantianism that offers ethical guidelines help! Are situations where sometimes quantity overrules or wrong is what constitutes the difference! Kantianism seek good results in life for people judging that action as right... Is based on the other hand, Kantianism, utilitarianism. ” what is the only pure good, Psychology. Is easier to determine a person ’ s ethics provide noble visions of,! System that judges whether an action is not based on its consequences from special good... This is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is right or wrong is constitutes! Act and rule utilitarianism. ” what is right only if the end does not justify means decisions based the!